Lawsuit Help Desk

Talcum Powder Lawsuits and Settlements

Have you or someone close to you used Johnson’s Baby Powder (with talc) or Shower to Shower (with talc) for 8+ years? Did you develop any of these cancers: Fallopian Tube cancer, Ovarian cancer or Mesothelioma (age 70 or younger when diagnosed)?  

Then there is a real likelihood you would qualify for a talcum powder lawsuit and settlement opportunity. 

Will your leading mass torts
firms take my case?

Contact us to find out (We’ll get back to you the same day)

"*" indicates required fields

I represent, understand and agree that: 1) I am 18 years of age or older; 2) I have read and agree to’s Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, that the representations here are Paid Attorney Advertising, and additional legal disclaimers herein (if any); 3) submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship; 4) I am not already represented by an attorney for this matter; and 5) I consent to be contacted under the Terms and Conditions of Contact in order to discuss my legal options, so that I may obtain legal representation.

Why Are Talcum Powder Lawsuits Being Filed?

The lawsuits claim that the extended utilization of talc, the principal constituent in items such as Baby Powder and Shower to Shower, may lead to ovarian cancer in some women. Pursuant to the legal claims in all 50 states, the plaintiffs claim that the producers of baby powder were aware of the presence of asbestos in talcum powder-containing products, which poses a risk of causing mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, but failed to advise consumers of this danger.

The majority of talcum powder lawsuits claim that talc cosmetic products, such as baby powder, can cause ovarian cancer due to asbestos contamination. Some lawsuits also argue that talc exposure is linked to fallopian tube cancer, peritoneal cancer, and mesothelioma. There have been claims that inhaling talcum powder caused mesothelioma and lung disease, with or without asbestos contamination.

Talcum powder manufacturers, distributors, brands, and retailers have faced numerous lawsuits and have been awarded billions of dollars in recent settlements and jury verdicts. The litigation over the potential health risks associated with talcum powder exposure continues.

Talcum powder has been a popular hygiene product for over a century. Women have used it for feminine hygiene, to reduce sweat and odor, and to soothe skin irritation. However, recent research has revealed a concerning link between talcum powder usage and the development of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and mesothelioma. Below we will discuss the medical research behind these findings and explore why talcum powder is causing such serious health problems.

Talcum powder is made from talc, a mineral that is composed of magnesium, silicon, and oxygen. Talc is a soft, fine powder that is often used in cosmetics, baby powder, and other personal hygiene products. It is commonly found in the Earth’s crust and is mined in several countries, including the United States, China, and Brazil.

However, talc is often contaminated with asbestos, a mineral that is known to cause cancer. Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral that was widely used in the construction industry until it was banned in the 1970s due to its cancer-causing properties. Asbestos fibers are small and can easily be inhaled or swallowed, leading to serious health problems.

When talcum powder is applied to the genital area, the powder can enter the reproductive tract and potentially travel to the ovaries. If the talcum powder contains asbestos, the asbestos fibers can embed into the lining of the ovaries, causing inflammation and potentially leading to cancer.

A study conducted in 1971 first suggested a link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer. Since then, numerous studies have been conducted on the subject, with a number of studies showing a link to cancer.

In fact, a meta-analysis conducted in 2013 reviewed 21 studies and found that women who use talcum powder on their genital area face up to a 30% to 60% increased risk of developing ovarian cancer or fallopian tube cancer. The study also found that women who use talcum powder on a daily basis face an even greater risk.

In 2006, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) declared genital talcum powder use as possibly carcinogenic to humans. IARC is a division of the World Health Organization, and finding the root causes of cancer is one of its main objectives. It found that asbestos-containing talc is “carcinogenic to humans.” But inhaled talc that does not include asbestos was classified by the IARC as “not classifiable as to carcinogenicity in people” due to the lack of data from human research and the sparse data from lab animal studies. However, the agency rates the use of talc-based body powder in the perineum (genital area) as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” based on certain data from human research that suggests a connection to ovarian cancer. There is a theory that talc particles can travel to the ovaries from the vagina, uterus, and fallopian tubes, causing inflammation, and increasing the likelihood of cancer growth.

The American Cancer Society has distinguished between talcum powder containing asbestos from asbestos-free talcum powder. As for the former, ACS has explicitly stated asbestos-contaminated talcum powder may cause cancer if inhaled. As for the latter, namely asbestos-free talcum powder, ACS has stated further research is required. It did suggest in 1999 that women use cornstarch-based products instead of talc-based products in the genital area. 

Asbestos tainted talcum powder has been linked with mesothelioma, a rare and dangerous cancer that affects the lining of the lungs, chest, and abdomen. While mesothelioma is often associated with industrial workers who were exposed to asbestos on the job, inhaled tainted talcum powder has analogously been  associated with mesothelioma.  

The FDA says that talcum powder may cause inflammation in some women that could lead to cancer. Talcum powder is made from talc, a mineral that absorbs moisture, oils, odor and reduces friction. About 40% of women use talcum powder regularly, found in baby powder, foot powder, medicated powder, cosmetics, and intimate hygiene products.

The talcum powder lawsuits claim that the manufacturers have been aware of the connection between the use of talcum powder and the increased risk of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma for over 40 years, but failed to inform users about this hazard. Scientific studies have demonstrated that women who use talcum powder on their genitalia once a week have a higher chance of developing ovarian cancer, ranging from 30-60%. 

Johnson & Johnson, a leading talcum powder manufacturer, is aware of studies showing the potential increased risk of ovarian cancer with its products, but refers to the research as inconclusive and does not include a warning. Despite this, thousands of ovarian cancer patients and their families have sued Johnson & Johnson for failing to warn consumers of the link between its products and ovarian cancer. In four out of five trials, juries have ruled against Johnson & Johnson, awarding over $700 million in damages.

The American Cancer Society recommends that women avoid using talcum powder on their genital area. Instead, they suggest using a soft, clean cloth or paper towel to absorb moisture. Women should also consider using talc-free products, such as cornstarch-based powders or other alternative products.

If you have been using talcum powder for personal hygiene and have concerns about your health, it is important to speak with your doctor. Your doctor can help you understand your risk of developing cancer and can recommend any necessary testing or treatment.


Talcum powder has been a popular hygiene product for over a century, but recent research has revealed a concerning link between talcum powder usage and the development of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and mesothelioma. Talcum powder is made from talc, a mineral that is often contaminated with asbestos, a mineral that is known to cause cancer. When talcum powder is applied to the genital area, the powder can enter the reproductive tract and potentially travel to the ovaries, where it can cause inflammation and potentially lead to cancer.

While some studies have shown no significant link between talcum powder and cancer, a meta-analysis conducted in 2013 found that women who use talcum powder on their genital area face a significantly increased risk of developing ovarian and fallopian tube cancer. Women who use talcum powder on a daily basis face an even greater risk.

To protect themselves, consumers should consider avoiding the use of talcum powder on their genital area and using talc-free products instead. If you have been using talcum powder for personal hygiene and are concerned about your health, speak with your doctor to understand your risk of developing cancer and to receive any necessary testing or treatment.

In conclusion, while talcum powder has been a popular hygiene product for decades, its usage has been linked to serious health problems. The link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and mesothelioma is clear, and consumers should take steps to protect themselves. By avoiding the use of talcum powder on their genital area and using alternative products, women can reduce their risk of developing these cancers and lead healthier lives.

Talc, used in the production of baby powder and shower products, is primarily mined in China, similar to the mining of copper or gold. Baby powder contains 99% talc while Shower to Shower contains 50% talc.

Tragically, each year in the United States, 24,000 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer, resulting in the death of 14,000 women. When talcum powder products are applied around the genital area, small particles can travel into the ovaries through the fallopian tubes, known as transmigration, and remain there for years.

It is claimed that the talc particles can cause the growth of ovarian cancer cells and that Johnson & Johnson was aware of studies dating back 25 years ago which showed a link between genital talc use and 10% of ovarian cancer diagnoses each year.


The Johnson & Johnson talc lawsuit claims  that the company knowingly sold a cancer-causing product and failed to warn customers of the potential health risks for decades. As a cosmetic product, the talc was not required to prove safety to the FDA.

Despite numerous studies dating back to 1971, the link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer remains a topic of debate with some studies showing an increased risk of 20% to 30%. The class action talcum powder lawsuit is based on the premise that women should avoid talcum powder due to its potential link to ovarian cancer.

The manufacturers have failed to provide adequate warning of the serious side effects associated with talcum powder, leading to recent legal action and significant verdicts in Johnson & Johnson lawsuits.

On February 3, 2023, the baby powder class action lawsuit is set to restart with a new judge, as Judge Freda L. Wolfson announced her retirement. The MDL panel has appointed Judge Michael A. Shipp to replace Judge Wolfson. Judge Shipp was nominated to the federal bench in 2012.

As of January 31, 2023, the Appellate Court has rejected Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to transfer its mounting talcum powder liability to bankruptcy. The Third Circuit Court dismissed the chapter 11 bankruptcy filed by J&J’s subsidiary, causing a 3% drop in the company’s stock, the largest single-day decrease in two years. J&J has stated that it will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court of the United States, but it is uncertain if the automatic stay will be continued while awaiting the outcome of the appeal, as it could take several years to resolve.

Over the past few years, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has faced thousands of product liability lawsuits due to claimed links between talcum powder and cancer. These lawsuits have been consolidated into a class action multi-district litigation (MDL). Despite attempts to address the issue through bankruptcy, the MDL continues. 

Recently, J&J announced a settlement of over 1,000 talcum powder cases in the MDL for $100 million, marking a significant change in their previous stance on talcum powder claims. Previously, J&J had denied any wrongdoing and aggressively defended themselves against all claims.

In August 2021, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay $26.5 million to a plaintiff in California who claimed to have developed mesothelioma from two decades of exposure to the company’s baby powder. This was the first victory in a talc-related case, but it was followed by a series of losses for J&J in similar trials across the country.

The latest big news is that J&J was paying $100 million to settle over 1,000 talcum powder cases in the MDL. This announcement marked a dramatic shift in J&J’s position on talcum powder claims. J&J had steadfastly refused to admit that there was anything wrong with talcum powder, and the company had aggressively defended all claims.

How can I tell if I might qualify for a talcum powder lawsuit?

To be eligible for a talcum powder lawsuit, you must meet the all of the following criteria:

  • Consistent use of Johnson Baby Powder (with talc) or Shower to Shower (with talc) for 8 or more years
  • 2020 or later diagnosis of one of the following cancers: Fallopian Tube, Ovarian or Mesothelioma.
  • Age 70 or younger at time of diagnosis
woman recovering in hospital who's filed a talcum powder lawsuit
weighing the benefits of talcum powder lawsuit

What are my legal fees, if your lawyers take my talcum powder lawsuit?

Our good news for you is that if you qualify, the legal representation will be entirely contingent fee. That means that all legal costs and expenses are borne by the law firm representing you. You pay nothing out of pocket. The legal costs and expenses come out of the settlement or award you receive. 

Remember, unlike most other mass torts sights, you will be represented by leaders in this field of mass torts, not simply personal injury lawyers or whomever is paying for leads to a marketing firm. 

And what happens on the off chance the case is not settled or won? You will owe nothing because the risk is entirely borne by law firm representing you.

What can I recover from a talcum powder lawsuit?

Mass torts cases frequently provide very high dollar settlements, where each plaintiff receives as recovery in the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. 

Having said that, we and our network of law firms have talked to thousands of injured. As we’ve heard time and again, and truly believe — there is no compensation that makes up for an injury, especially to one’s child. 

But now that your family is dealing with the pain and suffering, through no fault of your own, you may be entitled to very significant financial compensation. 

To be specific, you would be entitled to recover past, present and future medical and mental health bills, as well as lost wages. Recovery dollars also compensate for non-economic losses, such as past, present and future pain and suffering, loss of consortium (companionship), and emotional distress. 

celebrating a talcum powder lawsuit settlement
lawyer counseling about talcum powder lawsuit

If I’m qualified for a talcum powder lawsuit, do I have any obligations to Lawsuit Help Desk? to your lawyers?

You have no obligations to us if you’re qualified. If we find that you are qualified, and you wish to proceed with the mass torts firms we have provided for you, the lawyers will discuss the retention agreement with you.

How long do I have to file my talcum powder lawsuit?

For yours and your family’s sake, act quickly, even if it’s not with us. Why? Statutes of limitations restrictions exacerbated by lagging scientific research may prevent your recovery. Also, if you file late, you may miss important settlement opportunities.  That’s why it’s very important to secure legal representation as soon as possible. In fact, one of our lawyers’ first actions for you will be to check your state’s statute of limitations and repose. 

For every injury, each state has its own statutes of limitations (SOL) and statutes of repose (SOR). These statutes prevent lawsuits from being filed or enforced after preset time limits, which vary from state-to-state. After these periods pass, even if a lawsuit is filed, it will be dismissed and you will collect nothing. 

It may have taken years for scientific research to show a connection between the cause – here, toxic baby formula – and the patient’s symptoms. 

Manufacturers very often settle cases with thousands of defendants at a time; but in order to qualify as a recovery victim, your lawyer must have already filed your lawsuit. Contrary to urban myth, our lawyers have an obligation to the court to conduct their own due diligence – to see whose cases qualify based on leading medical research.

lawyers sprinting to file a talcum powder lawsuit
client contacts lawyer about talcum powder lawsuit

What are my next for filing and settling a talcum powder lawsuit steps?

Reach out to us for a quick assessment of your case. Do it today, do it now. Get peace of mind. 

Also, starting now, save every document our attorneys may need as evidence. That includes any proofs of purchase, receipts, packaging and boxes of baby formula. Our lawyers will tell you much more when you contact us. 

The Lawsuit Help Desk Difference

Unlike most others, we do not act like third party middlemen – instead, we provide you immediate access to top 1%, nationally renowned mass torts attorneys, with deep knowledge in Talcum Powder litigation. It is these leading lawyers who decide whether your case has merit. We will be forthright and honest with you.

Our mission is to inform the public, and provide direct access to leaders in the world of mass torts. 

We are not that annoying call center. We will respect your time. We will not hand you off, or give you the run around. 

We do not consider ourselves a marketing firm. Do not expect robocalls from us. If you’re emailed, it’s just to provide you helpful information, such as case status and ongoing research; you will not get spammy emails. We are here to help, not badger you.

A key distinction is that we have active attorneys and litigators on our staff. Do you really want advice about a mass tort that’s devastated your loved one’s lives — where settlements in the hundreds of thousands and millions are common — from a marketing or social media expert, a lifestyle coach, a psychologist or an influencer? In other words, we are not parroting talking points: We really know what we’re talking about. 

In fact, Lawsuit Help Desk was founded by Cameron Tousi, a leader in the world of complex litigation. He has received highest distinctions in peer reviews and awards from America’s leading legal publications. If you’d like to speak with Cameron, just let us know, and we’ll make it happen! 

Monthly Status Updates of Talcum Powder Lawsuits

A new judge, Judge Michael A. Shipp, has been appointed to replace Judge Freda L. Wolfson who announced her retirement.

He has ordered a status conference to be held on March 24, 2023 to discuss the progress of the talcum powder lawsuits. More than 2,400 of these cases are currently pending in state and federal courts around the country. 

Lawyers representing both sides will present their arguments as well as a summary of any relevant medical evidence they have in the case. Each side will also provide a status update on any settlement negotiations or potential resolution of the cases that could occur prior to trial. 

At this point, it is not known if Judge Shipp will rule on any motions related to the lawsuits during the conference. However, he is expected to hear oral arguments regarding certain issues and may issue rulings on those issues.

Judge Shipp is known for taking a thoughtful approach to his cases, and it is likely that he will take the time to ensure each side has an opportunity to be heard. It remains to be seen how his approach may affect the outcomes of these talcum powder lawsuits, but we will all have a better idea after the status conference in March.

J&J’s attempt to spin off talcum powder claims into bankruptcy was rejected by the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, which is a major win for plaintiffs and has far-reaching implications.

The 3rd Circuit will reject J&J’s bankruptcy strategy in February. J&J may appeal to the Supreme Court, but they are likely to settle a significant number of lawsuits before the claims are resolved. Although this may be considered more of a hope, there is a sense of excitement about the possibility of progress in this litigation after years of delays in 2023.

The number of pending talcum powder claims continues to grow with over 11,000 filed against J&J and other manufactures. Nearly 2,300 trials have been scheduled and some settled outside of court. Hundreds of new lawsuits are expected in the coming year as more women come forward seeking compensation for their ovarian cancer diagnoses related to using talcum powder products.

It remains unclear what type of damages or settlements may be available to those affected by the wrongful use of talcum powder products but the value is likely dependent on individual circumstances. Some plaintiffs have won jury awards in excess of $10 million while others have received smaller award amounts ranging from tens of thousands to millions depending on the severity of their injury or illness. 

Rewatch the 3rd Circuit oral arguments and found it to be a worthwhile viewing experience. Both sides presented strong arguments, and the panel of judges was top-notch. 

See here: 

The main takeaway was the confirmation of a circuit split among the 3rd, 5th, and 8th Circuits on whether non-resident plaintiffs can bring product liability claims against corporations in their home states. The court seemed to be leaning toward granting the motion to sever filed by Johnson & Johnson, which would preclude such claims. 

In terms of recently decided cases, three have been dismissed in December alone. A Michigan jury ruled that Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder did not cause the plaintiff’s mesothelioma and awarded only $11 million in damages, less than what he had sought. In Pennsylvania, a judge threw out a case because of insufficient evidence linking talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Finally, a judge in New Jersey dismissed a case because the plaintiff had failed to present sufficient evidence that Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder caused her mesothelioma. 

On the other hand, there have been some positive developments for plaintiffs as well. In California, a judge granted class certification to a group of plaintiffs who claimed that Johnson & Johnson’s talc products contained asbestos fibers and caused them harm. The ruling was a significant victory for the plaintiffs, as it allows them to join forces and prove their collective claims against the company in one trial. 

In sum, December has seen some setbacks for plaintiffs but also some promising developments. It remains to be seen how courts will rule on these cases and whether plaintiffs will ultimately be successful in their claims against Johnson & Johnson. 

J&J announced that it will no longer sell talcum powder products by the end of 2022 and transition to cornstarch.

The oral argument for the appeal challenging J&J’s talcum powder bankruptcy was set for September 22, 2022 and has implications for other mass torts. A decision is expected before the end of the year.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has moved to consolidate all pending talcum powder lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, where oral argument is scheduled for November 2021. 

In August 2022, a federal court judge in Texas dismissed a case against J&J but allowed an appeal at a later date. There are currently more than 18,000 cases pending in state and federal courts across the country. 

Some plaintiffs have achieved success so far; one was awarded $21 million by a jury in November 2020 while another recently received $10 million from J&J in settlement of her claims. Additionally, four talcum powder appeals have been heard by the Missouri Supreme Court. 

The outcomes of these cases are expected to have a significant impact on the other thousands of talcum powder lawsuits still pending. In addition, J&J continues to face pressure from its shareholders over the talcum powder litigation and has faced several shareholder derivative lawsuits in recent years. 

As more talcum powder trials continue in August 2022, plaintiffs and their lawyers will be closely watching for any new developments that could affect future claims against J&J. Additionally, it is likely that additional settlements may be announced as both sides look towards resolution of this long-standing litigation.  It remains to be seen how things progress in the months ahead as we move closer to the 2022 oral argument before the U.S District Court for the District of Delaware. 

The outcome of the talcum powder litigation will have lasting implications for J&J, who faces billions in potential liability, as well as all other mass tort cases that rely on similar facts and evidence. August 2022 is sure to be an interesting time as we await the final resolution of this long-standing lawsuit.

The appeal of J&J’s talcum powder bankruptcy is pending, and the plaintiffs have filed a motion asking the bankruptcy judge to allow them to submit their own proposal for settlement compensation.

The bankruptcy court appointed Kenneth Feinberg, a prominent mass tort mediator, to provide a settlement value assessment of the pending talcum powder claims.

There are 37,514 talcum powder lawsuits pending in the MDL class action and it continues to grow.

The talcum powder plaintiffs are appealing to the Third Circuit against J&J’s use of bankruptcy to resolve its talc settlement responsibilities. J&J’s lawyers will have 30 days to respond, and oral arguments may take place in October. A decision is expected by the end of the year but may take longer.

The District Court has yet to rule on J&J’s motion for summary judgment.

Additionally, the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC) filed a motion asking the court to grant class certification for thousands of individual claims that have been consolidated into the MDL. If granted, it will pave the way for a potential settlement with J&J.

A hearing is scheduled for August 2022 concerning an agreement between Johnson & Johnson and certain talcum powder plaintiffs regarding their claims involving ovarian cancer and asbestos exposure. 

The PSC submitted briefs arguing against J&J’s contention that all talcum powder litigation should be held in bankruptcy court, but this argument was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in May 2021 when they declined to hear the case.

J&J has been granted permission to continue its bankruptcy proceedings and is currently in negotiations with the creditors’ committee and other interested parties on a potential settlement agreement. 

The creditors’ committee is made up of representatives from the talcum powder plaintiffs, including those who have filed individual claims against J&J and those who are part of the consolidated MDL class action. Negotiations are ongoing but no agreements have been announced at this time. 

Overall, thousands of people affected by talcum powder injuries remain hopeful that a fair resolution will be reached and that they will receive any deserved compensation for their suffering. A decision is expected within the next few months or sooner. The outcome could finally bring closure to this long-running legal battle. 

The bankruptcy judge has allowed the automatic bankruptcy stay to continue while J&J and the plaintiffs negotiate a global settlement. However, the judge expressed frustration that negotiations are not making progress and may partially lift the stay to allow a bellwether trial to proceed.

The trial, set to begin August 2022, will be the first to go before a jury and may serve as a barometer for what a full trial could look like. In the meantime, J&J continues to deny any wrongdoing and denies that its talcum powder causes cancer.

Plaintiffs’ counsel has filed several new complaints in June 2022 involving J&J’s baby powder and other talc-containing products. These cases largely claim ovarian cancer caused by long-term use of these products. The lawsuits are pending in state courts across the U.S., with two consolidated suits being heard in federal court in New Jersey.

A federal bankruptcy judge has approved J&J’s bankruptcy plan to pay smaller settlement amounts, which will be appealed and the litigation will continue.

In the meantime, discovery of documents related to talcum powder lawsuits is expected to continue throughout April 2022. The monetary amount of settlements that have been reached so far range from $400-5000 per plaintiff. The bulk of plaintiffs will receive around $2,000 depending on the severity of their injuries and other factors such as lost wages and medical expenses. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have argued for higher levels of compensation due to J&J’s role in hiding knowledge about the potential dangers associated with its talcum powder products for decades.

In addition, thousands more individuals who believe they have been injured by using Johnson & Johnson baby powder or Shower-to-Shower body powder are filing lawsuits against J&J every month. Several states including California, Illinois, New York, and Texas are currently experiencing a surge in talcum powder cases due to the company’s failure to adequately warn consumers of the dangers associated with its products.

J&J continues to deny any wrongdoing and has continued to vigorously defend itself in court. However, with thousands more lawsuits still pending from individuals across the country, it is expected that many more settlements will be reached this month as well as next. As more information comes out about J&J’s knowledge of potential risks associated with their talcum powder products over the years, plaintiffs’ attorneys will continue to push for larger settlement amounts on behalf of those injured by using the company’s products. 

While the baby powder lawsuits are waiting for a ruling, a consumer watchdog group is calling for J&J to withdraw its talcum powder products from international markets.

A federal bankruptcy court will decide by the end of the month if J&J can use its controversial bankruptcy strategy to resolve the 38,000 pending talcum powder claims.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is also considering whether to ban the sale of talcum powder products in the US, with a decision expected by the end of February.

J&J has faced scrutiny over its baby powder for decades after talc was linked to ovarian cancer. A number of states have moved to limit or consider restricting sales of these products as well.

Meanwhile, plaintiffs’ lawyers are hoping that J&J will reach an agreement on compensation out-of-court. The company recently paid nearly $2 billion to resolve 22,000 claims related to its baby powder and Shower-to-Shower products in 2020.

It remains unclear what will happen next month regarding Talcum Powder Lawsuits against J&J. For now, there are no definite answers on the fate of these claims but it’s possible that a decision will be reached in February 2022.

The Third Circuit Court heard oral arguments from victims’ lawyers challenging J&J’s bankruptcy. The court expressed concern about the bankruptcy spin-off being filed in bad faith and questioned J&J’s attorney about the intention of the Bankruptcy Code.

Meanwhile, plaintiffs continue to pursue claims against J&J and other companies involved in the talcum powder industry. In a landmark ruling earlier this month, an appeals court found that Johnson & Johnson acted with malice and negligence when it published false information about the safety of its talc powder products.

This past January, victims of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma filed dozens of lawsuits against J&J and some of its subsidiaries claiming that they failed to warn consumers about the dangers posed by their talc-based products containing asbestos. The cases are currently pending in state courts across the country, including New Jersey, California, Texas, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida.

The findings from this case will set important precedents regarding warning labels, product liability and corporate responsibility. It has already sent a strong signal to other companies in the talcum powder industry about the importance of providing accurate information to consumers about the health risks associated with their products.

The Supreme Court rejected J&J’s argument to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the state of Mississippi, which is based on the same underlying facts as the baby powder lawsuits.

The state is accusing Johnson & Johnson of creating a public nuisance by misleading consumers about the safety of its talcum powder. The state is seeking an injunction and financial damages to protect Mississippi residents from J&J’s claimed misconduct.

A group of plaintiffs have also filed a class action lawsuit against J&J in New Jersey, alleging that they developed ovarian cancer after using talcum powder for long periods. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages on allegations that the company failed to warn consumers of the risks associated with talc products. 

In addition, several states are pressing lawsuits against J&J regarding its talcum powder product packaging. California and Washington are accusing J&J of failing to provide adequate warnings about potential health risks associated with talc-based products. 

The litigation surrounding J&J’s talcum powder is likely to continue into 2021, with more cases expected to be filed in the coming months. The company has been ordered to submit documents related to its talcum powder marketing and research practices as part of discovery in a number of lawsuits across the country. All of these developments could potentially impact J&J’s financial position and public perception going forward. 

 In light of the ongoing legal action, Johnson & Johnson has announced that it will phase out its iconic baby powder by the end of this year. While this decision may help protect against further claims and potential damages awards, there may still be significant consequences for the company if any additional lawsuits succeed in court.

There has been a recent spate of talcum powder verdicts, with J&J scoring some victories in trials, but also losing some.

The latest decision, from a Missouri state court jury in late September, awarded $2.1 billion to 22 women who claimed that their ovarian cancer was caused by Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products. The verdict came after J&J had won four out of five previous trials involving talc-related claims and the company is planning on appealing the decision. 

In addition, there are currently more than 20 thousand lawsuits against J&J alleging that its talcum powder products caused ovarian cancer or mesothelioma (a type of lung cancer). These cases are grouped together under MDL 2738 in New Jersey federal court and may be headed towards a trial as soon as early 2022. 

Meanwhile, lawyers for both sides are continuing to negotiate settlements for the remaining cases. To date, J&J has settled more than 30 thousand claims for $110 million. 

In addition, other talcum powder manufacturers are facing their own litigation over similar allegations of harm caused by their products. Just last week, Imerys Talc America was ordered to pay $11.1 million in damages to a California woman with mesothelioma attributed to its talc products. 

Overall, hundreds of millions of dollars have already been paid out in verdicts and settlements related to these talcum powder lawsuits, and likely billions more will be awarded or negotiated before the litigation is resolved. It is important that anyone who believes they may have been harmed by these products contact an experienced attorney to learn more about their potential legal options. 

News & Articles

Unveiled: The Silent War of Talcum Powder Lawsuits – A Journey of Struggles, Victories and the Human Spirit

Unveiled: The Silent War of Talcum Powder Lawsuits - A Journey of Struggles, Victories and the Human Spirit**

In a world where a daily routine turns into a life-altering situation, the silent war of talcum powder lawsuits unveils. This is a war not fought on battlegrounds, but in courtrooms, where unsuspecting women find themselves battling ovarian cancer, allegedly linked to their talcum powder use. The journey is fraught with shock, disbelief, and a frantic search for answers.

  • The shocking reality: The alleged link between talcum powder and serious health issues is a shocking revelation for many. A product once viewed as harmless now potentially carries severe implications.
  • The search for clarity: This alleged connection propels many to seek answers, often leading them to join the ranks of plaintiffs in talcum powder lawsuits.

Navigating the labyrinth of these lawsuits is a daunting task. At its core lies the scientific dispute over the alleged relationship between talcum powder use and health issues, a dispute mired in conflicting research and expert opinions.

  • The scientific debate: Establishing this relationship is a central point of contention, often shrouded in unclear scientific evidence.
  • The question of liability: Once a plausible link is established, the question arises – did the manufacturers know of the possible risks and fail to alert the consumers?

However, beneath the legal jargon lie deeply personal narratives of those whose lives were drastically affected. Their journey, marked by heartache and resilience, often ends in triumph.

  • The personal struggle: Despite physical pain, emotional turmoil, and the weight of a legal battle, many carry on, driven by an extraordinary resilience.
  • Triumph in adversity: Many plaintiffs report finding a sense of empowerment amidst the heartbreak, standing up against powerful corporations and demanding accountability.

The ripple effect of these lawsuits extends beyond the plaintiffs. The public's awareness of the alleged risks heightens, potentially influencing consumer behavior. Legal precedents set by high-profile lawsuits could reshape the landscape of product liability law.

  • Impact on public health: As media coverage increases, so does public awareness about the potential risks of talcum powder.
  • Legal implications: The rulings in these lawsuits could set legal precedents, influencing future related cases.

Amidst the struggle emerges a beacon of hope – the enduring human spirit. The plaintiffs' resilience and determination serve as an inspiration, shedding light on the potential for change when ordinary people demand justice.

  • Stories of resilience: Despite daunting legal battles, many plaintiffs find the process empowering, their stories serving as an inspiration to others.
  • Driving change: Collectively, their voices could potentially bring about significant changes in product safety standards and corporate accountability.

In conclusion, the talcum powder lawsuits are more than just legal battles. They're a testament to human resilience, the power of accountability, and the potential for change when ordinary individuals stand up for their rights. Amidst great adversity, the human spirit remains unbroken.

Read more here

The Unspoken Deadly Secrets of Talcum Powder: How Ignored Warnings Led to a Health Crisis and the Fight For Justice

In the backdrop of consumer trust and everyday household products, the curtain has been lifted on a controversial ingredient – talcum powder. This seemingly harmless mineral, praised for its softness and moisture-absorbing capabilities, has been linked to serious health issues like ovarian cancer and mesothelioma.

Victims are now launching legal battles against manufacturers, demanding accountability for their negligence and the resulting health crises.

Amidst the war cries for justice, the scientific community grapples with the challenge of establishing a direct causation between talcum powder use and resultant health issues.

At the epicenter of this controversy is the giant conglomerate, Johnson & Johnson. The company, alleged to have prioritized profits over consumer safety, faces accusations of suppressing information about potential risks tied to talc use – an issue that stirs up discussions on corporate negligence and profits over safety.

The fight for justice in the talcum powder crisis is ongoing, with thousands of lawsuits pending against Johnson & Johnson. These lawsuits represent a battle for corporate accountability, consumer protection, and transparency.

This unfolding drama poses a critical question – could manufacturers have done more to warn consumers about the possible risks? The silent killer of talcum powder is now in the spotlight, and the fight for justice for its victims is well underway. Yet, the legacy of this crisis will continue to resonate, serving as a stark reminder of the deadly cost of ignored science, silenced victims, and corporate negligence.

Read more here

Unveiling the Hidden Truth: How Pioneering Research Correlates Talcum Powder to Ovarian Cancer - A Lifeline for Lawsuit Warriors

Once a mere powder of innocence, talcum powder is now under the glaring spotlight of scientific scrutiny. Research corners it, associating its use with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. This provocative revelation is redefining the legal landscape, bringing hope to countless women embroiled in legal battles.

Talcum powder's tale is entwined with our history. Its cradle was the early 20th century when Johnson & Johnson introduced its talc-based baby powder. Its utility soon expanded beyond babies, becoming popular among women for personal hygiene. Yet, by the 1970s, early studies began casting shadows of doubt over its innocence, hinting at a potential correlation between its use and ovarian cancer.

• Pioneering studies in the field are forging a stronger link. The Epidemiological Investigation of Ovarian Cancer found a 30% surge in ovarian cancer risk among regular talcum powder users.
• Can talc particles, once applied, travel to the ovaries and trigger inflammation, eventually leading to cancer? Talc particles found in ovarian tumors raise this daunting question.
However, it's a complex conundrum, with some studies unable to establish a sturdy link. The scientific community remains in a tussle.

Amidst these scientific squabbles, are real women battling real ordeals. The talcum powder lawsuit claimants, the warriors, are the living testaments to the talc-ovarian cancer link.

• The tales of triumph, such as the woman from Missouri who bagged a $72 million lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson, offer a humanistic lens to the issue.
• Thousands of such heartrending narratives illustrate the struggle, tenacity, and resilience of these women, inspiring others to join the quest for justice.

These research breakthroughs spark a beacon of hope, empowering those seeking legal retribution. While they don't guarantee a lawsuit victory, they bolster the claimants' cases.

• These studies could potentially help courts comprehend the alleged talcum powder-ovarian cancer link.
• They also raise critical questions about product safety and consumer rights. Did manufacturers knowingly conceal these risks? Is it ethical to not warn consumers adequately?

The future of talcum powder, in the wake of these revelations, is shrouded in uncertainty. The public perception of this once-trusted product may drastically shift.

• Will manufacturers step up and reformulate their products or provide clear risk warnings?
• Will the medical community rethink their stance and warn patients about the potential risks, especially in regards to feminine hygiene?

These groundbreaking findings have not only unveiled a hidden truth but also initiated a potential tidal shift in our perception and use of everyday products like talcum powder. The question now is, are we ready to embrace this new reality? is dedicated to restoring justice by connecting every mass tort victim to leading litigation counsel. Their mission goes beyond offering free services, they aim to be the leading information portal for all those affected by mass torts.

Read more here

You won’t believe how much these talcum powder lawsuits are worth. If you thought a couple of hundred thousand was a hefty settlement, think again. These lawsuits have revealed millions – yes, you heard that right, millions – in payouts to those affected by talcum powder’s harmful effects. So why are these lawsuits worth so much? And who is responsible for the harm caused? All will be revealed in this eye-opening, no-holds-barred article on the untold story of talcum powder lawsuits.

The Dangers of Talcum Powder

Talcum powder, made from talc, a mineral composed primarily of magnesium, silicon, and oxygen, has been linked to various health complications, including ovarian cancer, lung problems, and an increased risk of mesothelioma. However, the dangers of talcum powder were not always known. In fact, talcum powder was widely used in baby powder products for decades before concerns were raised about its potential health hazards.

Johnson & Johnson and Talcum Powder

Johnson & Johnson, the largest manufacturer of talcum powder products, has faced numerous lawsuits related to the company’s talcum powder products. Lives have been lost, and Johnson & Johnson has been found to be aware of the potential risks but failed to warn the public.

The Hidden Millions Unveiled

Settlements for talcum powder lawsuits have reached the millions of dollars, with some even exceeding $100 million in value. These amounts may seem high, but talcum powder has had severe adverse effects on its users for years. Compensation for wrongful deaths, severe health complications, and the loss of income due to medical expenses is oftentimes the least that a victim of talcum powder deserves. For this reason, an increasing number of lawyers are diving into mass torts lawsuits, challenging manufacturers and holding them accountable for the harm their products have caused.

The Future of Talcum Powder Lawsuits

As legal battles continue to rage on, manufacturers like Johnson & Johnson are facing severe consequences for their lack of accountability regarding their talcum powder products. The US FDA has even regulated talc under its list of potentially dangerous cosmetic ingredients. It remains to be seen how much longer consumers will use talcum powders and how much longer manufacturers like Johnson & Johnson will continue to produce them.


Multi-million dollar settlements are a clear indication that talcum powder and its manufacturers are on the losing end of a multi-decade-controlled game of misrepresentation and misinformation. The mere fact that these payouts are necessary demonstrates how seriously these lawsuits are being taken by the judicial system. Through massive payouts for their grave mistakes, manufacturers are being held accountable for the harm their products have caused. That said, it begs the question of how many other products are out there lurking, silently causing harm without our knowing or anyone working to protect against them.

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: This Website is a group advertisement. It is not a lawyer referral service. is owned and operated by Awon Holdings LLC and is not a law firm. We connect people to legal service and there is no charge to be connected with an attorney. You are under no obligation to retain any services of those connected through our website. We try our best to keep things fair and balanced to help you make the best choice for you. This information does not constitute legal or medical advice and it should not be relied upon as such. Results are not guaranteed and past performance is not an indication of future success. Always consult with your doctor before modifying your medication or regular medical regimen.

Copyright © 2023 - All Rights Reserved