Skip to content
Lawsuit Help Desk

Lawsuit News Center

The Shocking Truth About Mass Torts in the US – Is Justice Being Served?

Every year, thousands of individuals in the United States suffer from injuries or illnesses that they believe were caused by a common source. It could be a product, medication, or even a workplace hazard that has affected a significant number of people. These cases are known as mass torts, and they have become a growing concern in the legal realm. With the number of mass tort cases on the rise, there has been a surge in statistical research aimed at understanding the trends and patterns associated with such litigations to better enable fairness, accuracy and the wins for the plaintiffs. In this article, we will delve into the world of US mass torts and statistical research to uncover whether justice is truly being served for those affected.

Mass Torts on the Rise in the United States

Mass torts have been on the rise in the United States for quite some time now. Between 1985 and 2011, the number of mass tort cases filed in the US increased by a whopping 1,177%. The reasons for this surge can be attributed to a variety of factors, such as the increased availability of information about harmful products, medications, and environmental hazards. Additionally, the internet has made it a lot easier for people to unite over a common cause, and the proliferation of mass media has allowed for greater coverage of large-scale legal battles.

The Importance of Statistical Research

One of the most important steps in any mass tort case is to have accurate statistical data about the number of plaintiffs, the demographics of the affected parties, and the losses they have suffered. Without this essential information, it can be difficult to build a strong case and to accurately identify the parties liable for the injuries. This is where statistical research comes into play.

Statistical research on mass torts involves a comprehensive analysis of all pertinent data with the aim of drawing accurate conclusions and informing the public of the scope and seriousness of the injuries. Some of the key factors that statistical research looks into include the causes of the harm (e.g., defective products, exposure to toxic substances, etc.), the demographic and geographic distribution of the plaintiffs, the severity of the injuries, and the compensation awarded to plaintiffs by defendants.

The most commonly used statistical method in mass tort research is regression analysis. This technique is used to identify the factors that are most closely associated with the injuries and to determine the degree of correlation between the plaintiffs’ injuries and the alleged causes. Other techniques include risk assessment, time-to-event analysis, and meta-analysis.

The Pros and Cons of Statistical Research

When it comes to using statistical research in mass torts, there are both advantages and disadvantages to consider. Some of the primary advantages include:

  • More accurate and objective identification of patterns and trends
  • Improved understanding of the nature and extent of the injuries
  • Better-informed decisions about how to proceed with the litigation

On the other hand, some of the primary disadvantages include:

  • The potential for incomplete or inaccurate data to skew the results
  • The reliance on retrospective data, which does not provide insight into the future
  • The potential for bias, particularly on the part of the researchers conducting the analysis

Despite these potential downsides, the benefits of statistical research on mass torts cannot be ignored. This data can be crucial in determining the compensation amount awarded to plaintiffs and can help to shed light on the companies and individuals responsible for the harm.

Notable Examples of Mass Torts and Statistical Research

There are several notable instances of mass torts in the US where statistical research has played a significant role in the proceedings. One such example is the case of Volkswagen’s emissions cheating scandal. In May 2020, a judge gave final approval for the settlement of one of the biggest automotive cases in US history. The settlement amount was $14.7 billion, and more than 550,000 consumers were represented in the case. The settlement amount was determined through a comprehensive statistical analysis of the affected individuals.

The opioid crisis is another example of mass tort litigation where statistical research was critical. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 70,630 drug overdose deaths occurred in the US in 2019, with opioids (including prescription drugs and illegal drugs like heroin and synthetic opioids) being involved in 49,860 deaths. Mass tort lawsuits have been filed against several drug manufacturers and distributors for their role in the opioid epidemic. Statistical research on the impact of opioid addiction on affected individuals has helped to build a strong case against these companies.

Conclusion

Mass torts are complex legal cases that require accurate and comprehensive data to determine the extent and severity of the harm caused. Statistical research is a vital tool in helping to identify patterns and trends in mass tort cases and to build strong cases against the individuals responsible for the harm. While there are potential downsides to using this research method, the advantages of obtaining high-quality data are undeniable. As mass tort cases become more common in the US, it is essential that researchers and lawyers alike continue to rely on accurate and objective statistical analysis to fight for justice on behalf of those affected.